Friday, May 10, 2019

Critically discuss Plato's theory of the psyche and relate it with Essay

Critically discuss Platos theory of the mortal and relate it with managing today - Essay ExamplePlato understood that the human psyche is in constant turn with the external social, cultural and political environment. The similarities between Platos and Freuds conceptions of the psyche are relevant to current business prudence because Freudian psychoanalysis is well entrenched in Human Resources Management practice. The go along utility of Platos theory of the psyche to modern managers is illustrated by its perusal in management seminars and workshops. even let on the process of knowledge creation and transfer prevalent in management practice today has parallels to Platos ideas on knowledge. Platos theory of psyche remains an eminent source of wisdom and counsel to leaders in various fields today. Introduction Plato is one of the most influential philosophers from the Hellenistic Age, whose ideas are restrained relevant to modern times. Business management as we know it today was not a immersion of Plato. For that matter, management of business enterprises under a capitalist framework is a modern phenomenon ushered in by the Industrial Revolution of late 18th century. But Plato was a polymath, who forwarded treatises on a range of subjects. Questions of what constitutes ripe governance under a monarch was a focus of his thought. When we look closely, there are many a(prenominal) parallels between the structure of a kingdom and that of a business corporation. Both are more or less authoritarian institutions with a top-down power hierarchy. With the net worth of many Fortune vitamin D corporations is homogeneous to the GDP of some nations, corporate houses are rightly referred to as empires in management literature. Hence, although the thoughts of Plato and that of hawkshaw Drucker are separated by two millennia, the former usher out be seen as a management guru in his own right. In particular, Platos speculations and assertions on the nature of hum an psyche have withstood the examine of time and are a useful aid to modern managers. This essay will flesh out this thesis in detail. Body of Essay It is fair to state that of all ancient Greek philosophers, it was Plato, who defined and characterized the nature of the psyche in great detail. Plato was the one who defined the abstract and the rational as equivalent to the moral good. He equated self-knowledge with self-restraint, and proclaimed that knowledge is virtue.... Lack of knowledge and the irrational, were equated with moral evil, and then, with madness. (Buckley, 2001, p. 452) For Plato, the soma makes up the physiologic body, while the psyche is the what animates a body and gives it life. Psyche is what distinguishes a living creature from a short one. The body, on the other hand, plays host to the psyche and can either restrict or extend the materialisation of psyche. According to Plato, the psyche is not made of substance and it is immortal. Plato divided human ps yche into three components the rational, emotive and appetitive. In simple terms, examples of appetites or desires are thirst, hunger, etc. The ability to overcome the appetites is the function of the rational. And the appetitive, also called the pure tone is the moral compass as attuned by social norms. He defined conflict as a struggle between the rational and the appetitive portions with each trying to enlist the affective portion on its side. (Buckley, 2001, p.453) For example, conflicts could arise in simple situation like these I know it is wrong to lie, but can

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.